The following is the established format for referencing this article:Liu, M., P. G. Kinnicutt, R. Goljani Amirkhiz, and D. L. Swanson. 2022. Arthropod prey and diets of woodland migrants are similar between natural riparian woodlands and anthropogenic woodlots in the northern prairie region. Avian Conservation and Ecology 17(2):45.
Migration is an energetically expensive activity with important links to population dynamics of migratory birds. Identification of high-quality stopover habitat to support migratory refueling is, therefore, important for woodland migrant conservation. Woodland habitat is scarce in the northern prairie region, consisting of natural riparian corridor woodlands (corridors) and anthropogenic woodlots (woodlots), but supports large numbers of migrant birds during stopover. To assess prey abundance, diet composition, and effects of prey abundance on the energetic condition of insectivorous migrant landbirds at corridors and woodlots in the northern prairie region, we sampled arthropods from the two habitats and collected fecal samples to ascertain migrant bird diets during spring and fall migrations. We found that standardized arthropod counts and biomass from all sampling methods showed no consistent differences between corridors and woodlots in either season. Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Diptera, and Hymenoptera were the dominant arthropod taxa in both seasons for both habitats. Migrant diets contained large proportions of Coleoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera in fall and Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera in spring at both habitats. Dietary analyses of percentage biomass revealed different patterns, with Lepidoptera highest in both seasons. Annual differences in arthropod counts and biomass were evident for both seasons, with lower counts and biomass in fall 2011 than in fall 2010 and in spring 2011 than in springs of 2010 and 2012. Only arthropods collected by sticky traps were positively correlated with plasma metabolites associated with refueling rates, and habitat type was not a significant predictor of plasma metabolite levels. These data collectively suggest that arthropods were present in sufficient abundance and diversity at both corridors and woodlots for migrant birds to successfully refuel at these riparian stopover sites.
Migration is an energetically expensive period in the annual cycle and woodland migrants typically cannot carry enough energy stores to complete migration in a single flight between breeding and wintering grounds. Migrants thus need to replenish fuel stores at stopover habitats along the migratory route to support subsequent flights (Hussel 1969, Blem 1980, Wang and Moore 1997). Stopover habitat quality, especially the availability of energetic resources, is a crucial factor influencing the population dynamics of migrants (Moore and Wang 1991, Newton 2006, Schmaljohann and Eikenaar 2017). Failure to find suitable stopover habitats may lead to lower fat deposition rates, and, thereby, lengthen the stopover duration and delay arrival on the breeding or wintering grounds (Francis and Cooke 1986, Moore and Wang 1991, Schmaljohann and Eikenaar 2017). Thus, stopover habitat quality affects the refueling performance of migrants, which, in turn, impacts migration speed and timing (Piersma 1987, Pierce and McWilliams 2004, Moore et al. 2017). Migratory timing influences nesting success and survival rates and can thereby impact migratory bird population trends (Newton 2006, Emmenegger et al. 2014, Janiszewski et al. 2014). Consequently, identification of high-quality stopover habitat along the migratory route is important for conservation of woodland migrant birds (Donovan et al. 2002, Mehlman et al. 2005, Newton 2006, Faaborg et al. 2010).
However, stopover habitat quality can be difficult to assess (Donovan et al. 2002, Melhman et al. 2005, Berlanga et al. 2010). Fattening rates derived from plasma metabolite profiling can serve as an integrated measure of refueling success of migrant birds at stopover sites, and by extension, habitat quality at stopover sites along the migratory route (Cerasale and Guglielmo 2010, Smith et al. 2015). Cues for habitat selection in migrant birds, however, may not always involve food abundance that would be expected to result in high refueling rates. For example, food abundance appeared to the be the most important cue for stopover habitat selection for frugivorous migrants, but insectivorous migrants appeared to use vegetative cues as the primary cue for stopover site selection (Wolfe et al. 2014). Habitat size, structure, vegetative diversity, thermal microclimates, competition intensities, predation pressures, and food resources may synergistically influence stopover habitat quality and affect prey choices, stopover behaviors, and physiological capacities of woodland migrants (Olson and Grubb 2007, Olson et al. 2010, Liu and Swanson 2014a). Indeed, Cerasale and Guglielmo (2010) found that ecological (stopover behavior and food resources) and physiological (fattening rates and stress physiology) measures are not always in accord with respect to stopover habitat quality, because habitats with higher arthropod biomass and insectivorous bird densities produced lower fattening rates for some insectivorous bird species. High bird density at a stopover site can suppress the arthropod prey base (Moore and Wang 1991) and fattening rates (Kelly et al. 2002, Cerasale and Guglielmo 2010) for migrants. Competitor and predator densities may also influence migrant behavior (Cimprich et al. 2005, Smith and Hatch 2008, Carlisle et al. 2009, Hope et al. 2014) and fattening rates (Lennox et al. 2016) at stopover sites, thus contributing to overall stopover habitat quality. Finally, stopover sites perform other functions for migrants than just refueling, including resting, waiting, recovering, sleeping, information collection, and social interaction (Linscott and Senner 2021), so fattening rates alone may not provide a completely accurate picture of intrinsic stopover habitat quality. Consequently, assessments of habitat quality using both ecological and physiological metrics are required to fully evaluate the factors and their interactions affecting habitat quality for woodland migrants.
Directly measuring habitat attributes, such as food resources, that influence stopover site suitability is a basic approach to assess habitat quality (Johnson 2007). Suitable stopover habitats must provide sufficient food resources of the right types as well as sufficient access to food for migrants (Martin and Finch 1995, Buler et al. 2007). Most migrant landbirds are primarily insectivorous, but frugivorous and granivorous migrants may expand diets to consume invertebrates to help meet the energetic requirements for migration and to enhance lipid and protein intake (Rappole 1995, Wolfe 2009, Pageau et al. 2020). Thus, documenting arthropod prey abundance and correlating arthropod abundance with migrant energetic condition are necessary to evaluate suitability of stopover habitats.
In the northern prairie region, woodland habitats were historically concentrated along river corridors, such as the Missouri River (Castonguay 1982, van Bruggen 1996). Since Euro-American settlement, these natural riparian corridor woodlands (hereafter, corridors) have been greatly reduced and degraded (Johnson 1992, Hesse 1996, Dixon et al. 2012), but these losses may potentially be mitigated to some extent by the appearance of anthropogenic woodlands (hereafter, woodlots) on the landscape. Both woodland types provide stopover habitat for woodland birds during spring and fall migrations and migrants occupy both corridor and woodlot habitats in this region during stopover in roughly similar numbers (Martin 1980, Swanson et al. 2003, 2005).
The Missouri River riparian corridor (the focus of this study) contains greater contiguous woodland areas, with higher vegetative diversity, than woodlots (Dean 1999, Swanson et al. 2003, Gentry et al. 2006). In addition, natural riparian woodlands are adjacent to rivers or streams, which may provide subsidies of aquatic arthropods, such as Chironomidae, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Plecoptera to terrestrial ecosystems (Butakka et al. 2014, Hamid and Rawi 2014, Muehlbauer et al. 2014, Wesner et al. 2020). Because aquatic arthropods differ from terrestrial arthropods in fatty acid composition of body tissues (Twining et al. 2018, 2019, 2021a) and dietary fatty acids can influence performance (Pierce and McWilliams 2004, Twining et al. 2016, del Rio and McWilliams 2016), such aquatic subsidies could influence migration and stopover biology in birds. Thus, these differences between corridors and woodlots might result in between-habitat variations of arthropod abundance and diversity. If differences in arthropod abundance and community composition exist between the two habitats, these differences may impact stopover habitat suitability and the distribution of woodland migrants between habitats, because migrants appear capable of responding to differences in food resources (Graber and Graber 1983, Wang et al. 1998, Rodewald and Brittingham 2002, Tietz and Johnson 2007). In addition, delineation of differences in arthropod abundance/biomass and stopover habitat suitability could help focus conservation efforts on preserving the highest-quality woodland stopover sites.
Previous studies suggest not only similar occurrence of migrant birds in the Missouri River riparian corridor and nearby woodlot habitats, but also similar functional habitat quality. For example, Liu and Swanson (2014a) compared plasma metabolite levels of landbird migrants at both corridors and woodlots, including both plasma triglyceride (TRIG; indicator of fat deposition rates) and β-hydroxybutyrate (BUTY; indicator of fat catabolism), which have been routinely used to measure fat deposition rates of birds during migration. Liu and Swanson (2014a) found that both plasma TRIG and BUTY levels suggested similar fat deposition rates of woodland migrant birds between corridors and woodlots. Between-habitat comparisons of stress physiology of landbird migrants to examine a potential effect of habitat quality on stress suggested similar plasma corticosterone (the main stress hormone in birds) levels in woodland migrant birds at corridors and woodlots (Liu and Swanson 2014b). To quantify woodland bird stopover behavior, such as stopover duration, movement rates, and temporary home range, Liu and Swanson (2015) conducted an experimental relocation study for Yellow-rumped Warblers (Setophaga coronata) during fall migration using radio-telemetry. Liu and Swanson (2015) found that Yellow-rumped Warblers showed similar stopover duration, movement rates, and temporary home range between corridors and woodlots.
Given similar fattening rates (Liu and Swanson 2014a), roughly similar bird abundances and community composition (Swanson et al. 2005), space use and stopover durations (Liu and Swanson 2015) in Missouri River riparian corridors and nearby farmstead woodlots, we might expect birds are foraging on similar prey in these two forest types, despite possible differences in insect community composition. Alternatively, birds maybe foraging on different prey species that are similar in nutritional value in terms of energetics and fatty acid content (Swanson et al. 2005, Wesner et al. 2020). The latter hypothesis predicts that similar fattening rates in the two habitats result from factors other than arthropod prey abundance or biomass, such as different arthropod communities with different nutritional value, different prey preferences, or differences in abilities of migrant birds to find arthropod prey between the two habitats. We address these hypotheses in the present study by assessing arthropod diversity and abundance at corridors and woodlots, examining dietary patterns of migrant landbirds, comparing dietary vs. habitat arthropod abundance/biomass and communities, and exploring trends between prey abundance and previous data (Liu and Swanson 2014a) on migrant energetic condition at the same study sites and during the same years. To do so, we sampled arthropods and collected fecal samples from woodland migrants at both habitats during spring and fall migrations. The comparisons of arthropod prey resources and diet composition of woodland migrants in this study complement previous studies in this study system (Dean 1999, Swanson et al. 2003, 2005, Liu and Swanson 2014a, 2014b, 2015) to provide a comprehensive assessment of stopover habitat quality at natural riparian corridor and anthropogenic woodlot habitats in the woodland-restricted northern prairie region.
We conducted this study in southeastern South Dakota, where woodlands cover about 4% of the total land area (Castonguay 1982). The riparian corridor of the Missouri River is the most extensive of these woodland habitats. Missouri River riparian corridor woodlands are mostly dominated by cottonwoods (Populus deltoides), with some later successional tree species, such as green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), elm (Ulmus spp.), and hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) also present (Hesse 1996, Swanson et al. 2005, Dixon et al. 2012). Woodlots are smaller (0.7–3.5 ha; Swanson et al. 2005), more isolated, and less vegetatively diverse than corridor woodlands (10.1–42.3 ha in the present study) and cover about 1% of the total land area in southeastern South Dakota (Castonguay 1982). Woodlot study sites are comprised primarily of elm, mulberry (Morus alba), box elder (Acer negundo), hackberry, and green ash (Swanson et al. 2003, Gentry et al. 2006). Both habitat types are embedded in a landscape matrix primarily of row-crop agriculture (Newberry and Swanson 2018). Corridors retain more forest area within the landscape than woodlots, but because corridor woodlands are narrow and rarely extend beyond 0.5 km from the Missouri River, the landscape surrounding both habitats is still primarily row-crop agriculture (Gentry et al. 2006). We sampled three study sites each from both corridor (all along the Missouri River) and woodlot habitats (Fig. 1) in Clay County, South Dakota, from among those sampled by Dean (1999), Swanson et al. (2003, 2005), Gentry et al. (2006), and Liu and Swanson (2014a, 2014b).
Food abundance and bird diet
We collected arthropods and bird fecal samples from corridors and woodlots during spring (20 April to 2 June 2010–2012) and fall (20 August to 30 October 2010–2011) migratory seasons. We sampled each of the six study sites once per week during both seasons, rotating through the sites, with woodlot and corridor sites sampled on alternating days. We collected all samples before 12:00 CDT and only on days without rain and with winds < 30 km/h.
We simultaneously applied branch-clipping, sticky-trap, and pitfall-trap methods to collect arthropods. Arthropod sampling locations were randomly chosen within a 200-m radius surrounding the locations where we set up mist nets to catch migrants concurrently. The branch-clip method is an effective method for investigating prey abundance for birds that feed on arthropods in foliage (Kuenzi and Moore 1991, Johnson 2000, Carlisle et al. 2012). Each day prior to branch-clipping, we generated three series of random numbers to determine which tree branches to collect in the field. One series of numbers (between 0 and 200 m) was used to determine the distance from the mist net. The second series of numbers (between 0 and 360°, with 0° as north) was used to determine the direction of sample collection from the mist net. If branch-clipping locations determined based on these two random numbers were outside of woodland habitat, we added 90° to the random direction until we arrived at a location within the woodland habitat. We collected a branch-clip sample from the tree nearest to the random location. The last series of numbers (from 0 to 10 m) was used to determine the height from which branches were collected. Branch-clip sampling was conducted from 10:00 to 11:30 CDT. A total of ten branch-clip samples were collected from two locations (five samples from each location) during a single sampling period at each study site. One branch-clip sample was collected at the randomly selected central location and the other four were collected 10 m from the selected center location in each of the four cardinal directions (Carlisle et al. 2012). To obtain a branch-clip sample, we placed a cloth bag over a terminal branch (samples were approximately 1 m in length) at a randomly selected height (measured with a drawstring marked at 0.5 m intervals) ranging from ground level to 10 meters. The bag was quickly sealed with the drawstring to prevent arthropods from escaping before clipping the branch into the bag (Johnson 2000). After insecticide treatment, the bag was shaken to release arthropods from the branch before removing the branch and inspecting it for remaining arthropods. The bags were brought back to the lab and arthropods were placed into 75% ethanol in collection vials.
Sticky traps were used to collect flying insects because branch-clipping may not effectively capture these insects (Kuenzi and Moore 1991). Sticky traps were prepared from 30.5 x 30.5 x 0.6 cm plywood strips. We spread non-toxic, non-drying sticky attractant (i.e., Tanglefoot, Contech Enterprises, Victoria, BC, Canada) onto both sides of the plywood strips. We deployed sticky traps at sunrise and collected traps before noon. During a sampling period, five traps were hung on the branches (1–3 m high) of trees at locations extending from the edge to the interior of woodlands across the location where we set up mist net to catch birds concurrently. The direction (between 0 and 360°) and the first location (between 0 and 100 m) for sticky traps were randomly chosen as described previously for branch-clipping. The remaining four sticky traps were hung following the same randomly chosen direction at 20 m intervals. After each sampling period, traps, with insects still attached, were brought back to the lab where insects were identified and placed into collection vials with 75% ethanol. We removed the attractant from traps and spread new attractant for the next sampling period.
Pitfall traps were used to sample ground-dwelling arthropods (Cooper and Whitmore 1990, Carlisle et al. 2012). We did not conduct pitfall-trapping in the spring of 2010 but did so during all other seasons. The direction (between 0 and 360°) and the first location (between 0 and 50 m) for pitfall traps were randomly chosen as described previously for branch-clipping. Following the chosen direction, on the first day of each sampling season, five metal cans (15.8 cm diameter, 17.6 cm depth) were buried flush with the ground at each study site, about 50 m apart. These locations extended from the edge to the interior of woodlands at the location where we concurrently captured birds. A thin layer (1–2 cm depth) of soapy water was poured into the bottom of each can to facilitate trapping of arthropods. Pitfall-trapping was also conducted from sunrise until shortly before noon each day. The soapy water was replaced at the beginning of each pitfall-trapping session. At the end of each sampling session, all arthropods were placed into vials with 75% ethanol.
Collected arthropods in all samples were identified, counted, and body lengths from head to the tip of abdomen were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using the built-in ruler on the dissecting microscope (Triplehorn and Johnson 2005). Based on published length and dry weight relationships (Rogers et al. 1977, Calver and Wooler 1982, Ganihar 1997), the biomass for each arthropod group was estimated. When no published length–weight relationships were found or the length of the arthropods fell outside of the range of the published length–weight relationship, we measured the biomass directly after 48 hours in a drying oven at 55 °C for Opiliones (daddy longlegs), Isopoda, Diplopoda> (millipedes), Chilopoda (centipedes), Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Neuroptera, and Trichoptera (Rogers et al. 1977).
Bird fecal sample collection and prey identification
Metabolic studies suggest that small birds need to fast for only 3–4 hours before they became postabsorptive (e.g., Brenner and Malin 1965). Thus, digestive retention times are short enough that we can be reasonably sure that items detected in the fecal samples were eaten at or near the study sites. Arthropods remaining in bird fecal samples are also strongly correlated to the true diet, with only minor bias against small and soft-bodied arthropods, so fecal samples can be used to non-invasively represent bird diets (Calver and Wooller 1982, Ralph et al. 1985, Carlisle and Holberton 2006). Concurrently with arthropod sampling efforts, we captured migrant birds with 9-m, 36-mm mesh nylon mist nets. Fecal samples were collected by holding birds in wax-paper lined boxes following capture. Fecal samples were then transferred to 75% ethanol-filled collection vials for preservation until later analyses. To identify diet components (e.g., arthropod body parts), fecal samples were teased apart in glass dishes under a binocular dissection microscope (Leica EZ6). The arthropod body parts in fecal samples were sorted, counted, and identified to taxonomic order, suborder, and family, when possible. The lengths of arthropods were estimated by measuring the length of body parts found in fecal samples and then calculating body length based upon a ratio of body part length to body length using reference samples of whole arthropods collected during sampling efforts. The number of arthropods of each prey type was conservatively estimated by body parts counted in fecal sample (e.g., seven legs in a fecal sample were counted as two arthropods). The biomass for each taxon was either directly weighed (see above) or estimated following published length–weight relationships (Rogers et al. 1977, Calver and Wooler 1982, Ralph et al. 1985, Ganihar 1997, Hódar 1997). Fruits in fecal samples were counted from individual seeds to provide information on fruits eaten by migrant birds.
Arthropod counts and biomass
To examine relationships among arthropod counts and biomass with predictor covariates, we developed a suite of five models for each season and sampling method to determine the best combination of random and fixed effect variables (see Table A1.14 for models). We used combinations of period and year as fixed and random effects and study sites as a random effect (to account for repeated measures) in models. We also ran models with no random effects. Other predictor variables in models included habitat (corridor vs. woodlot), plant type (branch-clip sampling only, see Tables A1.12 and A1.13), average daily temperature, and average daily wind speed. Average daily temperatures and wind speed for Vermillion, Clay County, South Dakota, were downloaded from the Weather Channel (https://weather.com/weather), which records temperature measurements every hour and wind speed measurements every 2 minutes and averages these measurements over a 24-h day. For models of biomass, we developed generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and generalized linear models (GLM) for models with and without random effects, respectively. For models of arthropod counts, we used negative binomial distributions to account for potential overdispersion in the data. For these models, we used the “glmer.nb” functions of R-package “lme4” (version 1.1-28; Bates et al. 2015) for GLMM models and the “glm” function of R-package “stats” (version 3.6.2; R Core team 2020) for the GLM model with no random effects, and used maximum likelihood approaches for estimating variable effects for all models. We compared each suite of models using AIC, and selected models with the lowest AIC scores for subsequent analyses. For biomass analyses, we used GLM and GLMM models with a Gaussian distribution, because these data were continuous in nature. We also used GLM (for models with no random effects) and GLMM approaches, using the same distributions and R packages as above, to test for seasonal variation in arthropod abundance and biomass. For these analyses we pooled spring and fall data for each sampling method and used combinations of plant species (branch-clip samples only), period, and year as fixed and random effects and study sites as a random effect (to account for repeated measures) in models. We also ran models with no random effects. We included average temperature and average wind speed as predictor variables in all seasonal models and used AIC to evaluate model fit and selected models with the lowest AIC scores for subsequent analyses. For all models, we considered models with a ΔAIC of < 2 as competitive with the top model.
Arthropod community diversity
We calculated the Gani-Simpson’s Index (D) of arthropod diversity from pooled data from all three sampling methods for each sampling day and calculated mean values of D from all daily samples for both corridors and woodlots separately. We then applied a Student’s t-test to compare mean arthropod diversity between the two habitats (Jost 2006). We also calculated Morisita’s Index (CH; Horn 1966) to compare between-habitat similarity of pooled arthropod taxa from all years for both spring and fall seasons. The value of Morisita’s Index ranges from 0 (0% overlap) to 1 (100% overlap). If arthropod taxa showed strong between-habitat overlap, we used a contingency table test with Chi-square (χ²) to determine if the frequencies of arthropod taxa differed between corridors and woodlots.
We also calculated Morisita’s Index to estimate between-habitat similarity of arthropod communities in bird diets and used a contingency table test with Chi-square (χ²) to compare the frequency of arthropod taxa in the diets (pooled across all years) of individual bird species at corridors and woodlots, when we obtained sufficient samples from each habitat (n ≥ 10; Carlisle et al. 2012). If the relative frequency of arthropod taxa in bird diets differed significantly between habitats, we tested for differential consumption of prey for individual bird species at corridors and woodlots separately (that is, by pooling diets across individuals within each habitat). If there was no significant between-habitat difference in frequencies of occurrence, we pooled diets of individuals sampled from both habitats to test prey consumption vs. abundance. For those species where we obtained ≥ 10 fecal samples from both habitats combined, we pooled diets of birds from both habitats to test prey consumption vs. abundance (see Appendix 1, “Diet composition versus prey abundance”).
We grouped migrants into foraging guilds (Tables A1.6–A1.11) as described previously (Simberloff and Dayan 1991, Martin and Finch 1995, Liu and Swanson 2014a, 2014b). We pooled arthropods collected from sticky traps to assess prey consumption vs. abundance for the flycatcher guild, from branch clips for the foliage-gleaning guild, and from pitfall traps for the ground-foraging guild (Martin and Finch 1995). For each foraging guild, we followed Johnson (1980) to compare the average difference between ranks of presence in the habitat (counts and biomass) and dietary arthropod counts and biomass. This allowed us to test relative consumption of arthropod groups in the diet against expectations derived from presence in the habitat. Although we recognize that our arthropod sampling methods imperfectly measure arthropod prey availability to birds, we still compared arthropods sampled from the habitats with those in bird diets to allow for future hypotheses on which arthropod taxa might be particularly important to migrant birds in these habitats.
Arthropods and plasma metabolites associated with fattening
To investigate the possible effects of arthropods on the energetic condition of migrant birds, we examined correlations between arthropod abundance or biomass with those for plasma triglycerides (TRIG, a measure of fattening rate) and plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (BUTY, a measure of fat mobilization). We obtained plasma TRIG and BUTY data from Liu and Swanson (2014a), who measured plasma metabolite concentrations from migrant landbirds captured concurrently with arthropod and fecal sampling from the same study sites. We hypothesized positive correlations between arthropod abundance and plasma triglycerides and negative correlations between plasma β-hydroxybutyrate and arthropod metrics (Schaub and Jenni 2001, Bairlein 2002). We used GLMM models with TRIG or BUTY as dependent variables (separate models for each metabolite) with separate models for both arthropod counts and biomass and separate models for spring and fall. GLMM models included year as a random effect and arthropod metrics (counts and biomass) for branch-clip, sticky-trap and pitfall-trap sampling methods, average temperature, time since sunrise (min), period (three equal time periods in spring and four in fall, as described above), habitat (corridors vs. woodlots), and foraging guild (as described above), as predictor variables. We employed a Gaussian distribution for these models, because the plasma metabolite data were continuous in nature, and used maximum likelihood approaches for estimating variable effects.
All statistical analyses were performed with R (version 3.6.2; R Core Team 2020). Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. Results are presented as means ± SE.
Arthropod abundance and diversity
We collected a total of 7187 arthropods in spring (2652 at corridors and 4532 at woodlots). All collected arthropods in spring were from 54 and 53 discrete taxa at corridors and woodlots, respectively (Table A1.1). Arthropod diversity combined across all three sampling methods was similar between corridors (D = 0.89 ± 0.10) and woodlots (D = 0.87 ± 0.10) in spring. Morisita’s Index (CH = 0.91) suggested strong, consistent similarity of arthropod communities between corridors and woodlots in spring.
Spring per-branch counts (arthropods/dm) of foliage-dwelling arthropods were significantly lower (Table A1.12) at corridors (6.49 ± 0.37) than at woodlots (12.04 ± 1.13; Fig. 2). The per-branch arthropod biomass, however, did not differ significantly (Table A1.13) between corridors (0.82 ± 0.10 mg/dm) and woodlots (0.76 ± 0.08 mg/dm) in spring (Fig. 2). Habitat was not a significant predictor for pitfall-trap arthropod counts (arthropods per trap hour) in spring but was a significant predictor for sticky-trap arthropod counts, which were higher in woodlots than in corridors (Table A1.12). Habitat was not a significant predictor for arthropod biomass (mg ⋅ trap hour-1) for either pitfall or sticky traps in spring (Table A1.13).
We collected 10,466 arthropods in fall (4309 at corridors and 6157 at woodlots). All collected arthropods were from 59 and 62 discrete taxa at corridors and woodlots habitats, respectively (Table A1.2). Ceratopogonidae and Odonata were collected only from woodlots and Berytidae and Plecoptera were collected only from corridors (Table A1.2). Similar to spring, arthropod diversity combined across all three sampling methods was similar between corridors (D = 0.79 ± 0.09) and woodlots (D = 0.87 ± 0.06) in fall. Morisita’s Index (CH = 0.90) suggested strong, consistent similarity of arthropod communities between corridors and woodlots in fall.
In fall, habitat was a significant predictor of per-branch counts (arthropods/dm) of foliage-dwelling arthropods (Table A1.12) and arthropod counts were lower at corridors (9.54 ± 0.46) than at woodlots (14.13 ± 0.74; Fig. 2). However, although habitat was also a significant predictor of per-branch biomass of foliage-dwelling arthropods in fall (Table A1.13), the relationship showed the opposite trend (Fig. 2) with higher biomass at corridors (2.61 ± 0.27 mg/dm) than at woodlots (1.59 ± 0.23 mg/dm). Habitat was also a significant predictor of pitfall-trap arthropod counts in fall but was not a significant predictor of sticky-trap counts (Tables A1.12 and A1.13). Fall pitfall-trap arthropod counts were higher in woodlots than in corridors. Per-hour biomass (mg ⋅ trap hr-1), however, was not significantly impacted by habitat for either pitfall or sticky traps in fall (Tables A1.12 and A1.13).
For branch-clip samples, the best-fit model for arthropod counts had site as the only random effect and the best-fit model for biomass had no random effects (Table A1.14). Season was a significant predictor of arthropod counts (Z1413 = 12.129, P < 0.001) and biomass (t1430 = 31.465, P < 0.001) for branch-clip samples, with per-branch counts (arthropods/dm) and biomass (mg/dm) of foliage-dwelling arthropods both significantly higher in fall (counts: 11.80 ± 0.44; biomass: 2.11 ± 0.18) than in spring (counts: 9.23 ± 0.60; biomass: 0.79 ± 0.06; Figs. 2–4, Table A1.14). Best-fit models for arthropod counts and biomass for sticky traps were models with no random effects (Table A1.14). Season was a significant predictor of arthropod counts (Z130 = 3.606, P < 0.001) and biomass (t133 = 2.803, P = 0.005) for sticky-trap samples, with flying insect counts and biomass (mg/hr) significantly higher in spring (counts: 1.52 ± 0.22; biomass: 1.58 ± 0.25) than in fall (counts: 0.85 ± 0.10; biomass: 1.38 ± 0.22; Figs. 2–4, Table A1.14). Pitfall traps showed best-fit models with no random effects for arthropod counts and with site as a random effect for biomass (Table A1.14). Season was a significant predictor of arthropod counts for pitfall-trap samples (Z116 = 2.644, P = 0.008), with per-hour counts in spring greater than those in fall (spring: 4.14 ± 1.07, fall 2.33 ± 0.39). Season, however, was not a significant predictor of arthropod biomass (spring: 11.53 ± 2.55 mg, fall: 10.51 ± 1.92 mg; Figs. 2–4, Table A1.14). Year-to-year differences were also apparent: both arthropod counts and biomass from all sampling methods were lower in spring 2011 than in 2010 and 2012 and lower in fall 2011 than in fall 2010, except for arthropod biomass from branch-clipping samples (Fig. 3, Tables A1.12–A1.13).
We collected 123 and 205 fecal samples from 8 and 10 migrant bird species from various foraging guilds in spring and fall, respectively, to analyze diets (Tables A1.4 and A1.5). The pooled arthropod communities from bird diets showed strong overlap (CH = 0.93 in spring, CH = 0.85 in fall) between corridors and woodlots in both spring and fall. Dietary arthropod counts were dominated by Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera in spring (80.2%), and Hemiptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera in fall (70.3%; Tables A1.4 and A1.5). The percent biomass of Lepidoptera (25.8%) was the highest of all arthropod items consumed by birds at woodlots during spring. At corridors in spring, Diptera (23.5% of total biomass) and Lepidoptera (20.9% of total biomass) were the dominant dietary arthropods by biomass (Table A1.4). The percent biomass of Lepidoptera (22.7%) formed the highest proportion of total biomass for all arthropods consumed by fall migrants at corridors. Odonata (27.4%) and Lepidoptera (20.8%) comprised the highest biomass of all arthropods ingested by fall migrants at woodlots (Table A1.5).
Migrant birds consumed some arthropod taxa at higher or lower levels than expected based upon presence (see Appendix 1 and Tables A1.6–A1.11 for details). Interestingly, comparisons based on arthropod counts or biomass sometimes gave opposing results regarding the relative importance of diet items, although some generalizations are evident. The migrant community as a whole consumed more Formicidae, Lepidoptera, and Carabidae in spring and Auchenorrhyncha, Sternorrhyncha, Carabidae, Lepidoptera, and Nemetocera in fall than expected based on counts or biomass.
Aquatic insects were generally not highly represented in migrant diets at either corridors or woodlots at either season (Tables A1.4 and A1.5). For spring migrants, Chironomidae, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Plecoptera contributed only 3.4 and 9.7% of total counts of arthropods in migrant diets at corridors and woodlots, respectively. Similarly, aquatic insects were not frequently observed in migrant diets during fall migration, given that Chironomidae, Emphemeroptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata comprised only 9.4 and 8.7% of total arthropod counts at corridors and woodlots, respectively. Thus, aquatic subsidies were apparently not numerically important contributors to migrant diets at our study sites, even at corridor habitats near the Missouri River.
We observed a total of 32 seeds in bird diets, and 68.8% of the seeds were found in birds from corridors. Almost two-thirds (65.6%) of these seeds occurred in the diet of a single species, the Yellow-rumped Warbler (Table A1.5). Of the seeds consumed by Yellow-rumped Warblers, 80.9% occurred in diets at corridors. Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) seeds (n = 9) were observed in the diets of Yellow-rumped Warblers only at corridors, where poison ivy is much more abundant than at woodlots (personal observation). The remaining seeds came from the diets of Warbling Vireos (Vireo gilvus), White-throated Sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis), and Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis; Table A1.5). The 32 seeds included dogwood (Cornus spp.), wild grape (Vitis spp.), poison ivy, and grasses (Table A1.5).
We obtained sufficient sample sizes to compare dietary arthropod frequencies between habitats for a few individual species, including Swainson’s Thrushes (Catharus ustulatus), and Least (Empidonax minimus) and Traill’s (E. alnorum and traillii) Flycatchers in spring, and Warbling Vireos, and Orange-crowned (Leiothlypis celata), Nashville (L. ruficapilla), and Yellow-rumped Warblers in fall. Dietary arthropod frequencies were similar between corridors and woodlots for all these species, except for Yellow-rumped Warblers (χ² = 142.0, P < 0.001) in fall and Swainson’s Thrushes (χ² = 15.01, P = 0.02) in spring (Tables A1.4 and A1.5). Swainson’s Thrushes consumed larger proportions of Hymenoptera (63.1% at corridors, 48.7% at woodlots) and smaller proportions of Coleoptera (12.7% at corridors, 27.7% at woodlots) at corridors than at woodlots (Table A1.4). Formicidae (56.3% at corridors, 47.9% at woodlots) contributed the largest proportion of Hymenoptera in Swainson’s Thrush diets (Table A1.4). Yellow-rumped Warblers consumed the largest percentages by count of Sternorrhyncha (34.8%) at woodlots and Nematocera (37.7%) at corridors (Table A1.5).
Arthropod abundance vs. energetic condition
For spring GLMMs for plasma metabolites, the only significant effector of triglyceride levels was time since sunrise, which was significantly positively associated with triglyceride levels for analyses of arthropod biomass and nearly significantly positively associated with triglyceride levels for analyses of arthropod abundance (Table A1.15). Plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels in spring were significantly positively correlated with period for migratory periods 2 and 3 and significantly negatively correlated with the flycatcher guild for both arthropod abundance and biomass (Table A1.15). These data signify that plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels increased as the spring migratory season progressed and that flycatchers had lower β-hydroxybutyrate levels than other foraging guilds. In addition, spring plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels were significantly positively associated with arthropod abundance, but not biomass, from sticky-trap captures (Table A1.15), signifying higher plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels with higher arthropod numbers collected by sticky traps.
Plasma triglyceride levels in fall were significantly positively correlated with arthropod abundance and biomass from sticky trap collections (Table A1.15). Fall plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels were significantly positively correlated with period for period 2 for analyses of both arthropod abundance and biomass (Table A1.15), signifying that plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels increased as the fall migratory season progressed from late August to mid-September. Time since sunrise was also significantly negatively correlated with plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels in fall for analyses of arthropod abundance and nearly significantly negatively correlated for analyses of arthropod biomass (Table A1.15).
Neither branch-clip nor pitfall-trap arthropod abundance or biomass had any significant effect on plasma metabolite levels at either season (Table A1.15). In addition, habitat (corridors vs. woodlots) had no significant effects on plasma metabolite levels in either spring or fall (Table A1.15), suggesting that relationships between plasma metabolites and potential effectors were similar in both habitats.
Arthropod abundance and diversity
Our data suggest that corridors and woodlots provide roughly similar standardized arthropod abundance and diversity for migrant birds during both spring and fall migrations. Some differences in standardized arthropod counts or biomass occurred between corridors and woodlots, including spring branch-clip, spring sticky-trap, fall pitfall-trap counts and fall branch-clip biomass, which were greater in woodlots than in corridors, and fall branch-clip counts, which were greater in corridors than in woodlots. Despite these differences, the majority of comparisons of arthropod abundance and biomass did not identify differences between habitats and differences, when present, were not in consistent directions. Thus, no clear pattern of variation in arthropods between corridors and woodlots relevant to migrant bird food resources was apparent. Furthermore, Simpson’s and Morisita’s indices also suggest similar arthropod diversity and a strong overlap of arthropod communities between these two habitats, at least at the taxonomic levels of orders, suborders, and dominant families.
Aquatic arthropod subsidies (Smith et al. 2007, Muehlbauer et al. 2014, Schilke et al. 2020, Wesner et al. 2020), including such taxa as Chironomidae, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Plecoptera might be expected to supplement arthropod communities and increase overall arthropod abundance at corridor relative to woodlot study sites. In addition, adult aquatic insects may represent an important dietary subsidy for riparian birds (Smith et al. 2007, Allen 2019). Aquatic arthropods obtain highly unsaturated omega-3 fatty acids (HUFAs) from their algal-based diet and, therefore, differ from terrestrial arthropods in fatty acid composition of body tissues (Twining et al. 2018, 2019, 2021a). Aquatic dietary subsidies make these essential HUFAs, which are largely absent from diets based on terrestrial arthropods, available to riparian birds (Twining et al. 2018, 2019, Allen 2019). HUFAs acquired by dietary subsidies of aquatic arthropod prey to riparian birds may positively impact breeding and flight performance (Pierce and McWilliams 2004, del Rio and McWilliams 2016, Twining et al. 2016), although this may vary according to foraging strategy, with aerial insectivores generally obtaining greater dietary subsidies of HUFAs that terrestrial foraging bird species (Schilke et al. 2020, Manning and Sullivan 2021, Twining et al. 2021b). Contrary to the beneficial effect of HUFAs in aquatic subsidies, aquatic arthropods may also provide an avenue for contaminants to bioaccumulate in riparian birds, with potential negative consequences for performance (Rowse et al. 2014, Jackson et al. 2020, Kraus et al. 2021, Twining et al. 2021a). Thus, avenues exist for direct effects of aquatic subsidies in the diets of migratory birds on overall migratory performance, potentially including stopover biology. At our study sites, all Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera collected, as well as over 90% of Trichoptera collected were from corridor study sites. However, over 50% of Chironomidae were collected at woodlots in both spring and fall. Overall arthropod abundance was not elevated at corridor compared to woodlot study sites and aquatic arthropods contributed < 5% in both spring and fall to the total number of arthropods collected at these sites. Thus, aquatic arthropod subsidies do not appear to be a major supplement to terrestrial arthropod communities at riparian corridor sites in this study and seem unlikely to markedly alter migration performance in the study region for most terrestrial riparian birds.
Dietary arthropod data also suggested that corridors and woodlots provide similarly suitable stopover habitats in both spring and fall migrations. Migrant birds fed on a variety of arthropods and all arthropods consumed by individual bird species were observed at both corridors and woodlots. Morisita’s Index also indicated substantial overlap in dietary arthropods consumed in both habitats. The dominant dietary arthropods in this study are consistent with Dean (1999), who documented that Coleoptera and Hemiptera were the most frequently observed dietary items in both spring and fall at riparian corridor woodlands in southeastern South Dakota. Hemipterans were also the most important dietary arthropod taxon during fall migration for migrants in shrub and woodland habitats in Idaho (Carlisle et al. 2012). Similarly, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Hymenoptera were important dietary arthropods of spring landbird migrants at stopover sites along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona (Yard et al. 2004). In eastern North America, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, and Diptera were also important dietary arthropods of landbird migrants. Holmes and Robinson (1988) and Parrish (1997) documented that Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Diptera were the dominant dietary arthropods for migrants in New Hampshire and Rhode Island, respectively. Strode (2009) found that Psyllidae (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha) comprised the majority of dietary arthropods for Yellow-rumpled Warblers in east-central Illinois. At tropical stopover sites, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera were important dietary arthropods of landbird migrants (Poulin and Lefebvre 1996, Wolfe 2009). The high consumption of Hymenoptera in spring in the present study was primarily because of two ground-foraging thrush species, Gray-cheeked (Catharus minimus) and Swainson’s Thrushes. Ants (Formicidae) comprised 49.4% and 51.8% of all dietary arthropods for Gray-cheeked and Swainson’s Thrushes, respectively. Similarly, ants (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) were one of the dominant arthropod taxa in the diets of ground-foraging migrants at other locations (Holmes and Robinson 1988, Johnston and Holberton 2007, Steele et al. 2010). Thus, migrants at our study sites tended to forage on generally similar arthropod taxa compared to migrants at other stopover sites in North and Central America.
Similar to Dean (1999), we did not observe a large proportional abundance or consumption of arthropod larvae, such as lepidopteran larvae, at our study sites. This similarity to the results of Dean (1999) occurred despite the different sampling methods in the two studies, as Dean (1999) used emetic sampling, which should be less biased against soft-bodied insects than the fecal sampling that we used in this study. Lepidopteran larvae may form the dominant ingested arthropod prey item by woodland migrants at some other stopover sites where the abundance of caterpillars was high (e.g., Graber and Graber 1983, Moore and Wang 1991, Yard et al. 2004). For example, Graber and Graber (1983) and Moore and Wang (1991) found that lepidopteran larvae contributed over 46% of total arthropod counts. However, Lepidoptera did contribute the largest proportion of biomass of bird diets at our study sites in both spring (22.3%) and fall (21.8%), but this was primarily because of the large size of ingested adult, rather than larval, Lepidoptera.
If aquatic subsidies of arthropod resources are important to migrant birds, we should expect migrants to feed more frequently on aquatic insects at corridors than at woodlots. Chironomidae were eaten by all bird species, but chironomids and other aquatic insects were eaten at low proportions relative to all arthropods in both spring and fall. The low consumption of aquatic insects by most bird species at both habitats and seasons suggests that aquatic arthropods were not important dietary components at either corridor or woodlot study sites for most bird species. Similarly, Dean (1999) found low availability and a relative lack of use of aquatic arthropods, Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata along river corridors in southeastern South Dakota. The minor importance of aquatic insects in bird diets in this study might be due to a rapid reduction in aquatic arthropod abundance with distance from the riverbank (Triplehorn and Johnson 2005, Chan et al. 2007, Muehlbauer et al. 2014), because Missouri River riparian corridors at our study sites were often wider than 0.5 km, or to dietary preferences for terrestrial arthropods.
Our data suggesting a minor importance of aquatic insects in migrant diets are consistent with some other studies of migrant diets. For example, Yard et al. (2004) found that aquatic arthropods contributed only 9% of total counts of dietary arthropods along the Colorado River in Arizona. Poulin and Lefebvre (1996) and Bibby and Green (1981, 1983) found that Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, and Odonata were available in low numbers and were rarely eaten by migrating landbirds at stopover sites in Panama and western France, respectively. Exceptions to the finding that aquatic insects are not important components of migrant diets are the studies of Dallman and Smith (1995), Smith et al. (2007), and Ewert et al. (2011), who documented that Chironomidae (Diptera, Nematocera) was an important arthropod for landbird migrants at stopover sites along the shore of Lake Huron in early spring when the abundance of Chironomidae was high. A similar dietary use of on an ephemeral abundance of chironomids might be a possible explanation for the higher proportion of Chironomidae in the diets of early spring migrant Yellow-rumped Warblers at woodlots, where we collected the largest numbers of chironomids.
In this study, we focused on insectivorous migrant landbirds and did not quantify fruit abundances at our study sites, but we did identify fruit seeds in bird diets. For the 32 total seeds that we observed, more than half were in the diets of fall migrant Yellow-rumped Warblers, a late-arriving fall migrant species in southeastern South Dakota (Tallman et al. 2002, Swanson et al. 2003). Fruit consumption in Yellow-rumped Warblers may be associated with a rapid decrease of arthropod prey availability (Berthold 1976). Consistent with this argument, we found that arthropod prey availability rapidly decreased from mid-September to mid-October concurrent with the arrival of Yellow-rumped Warblers.
We found that most individual bird species showed similar frequencies of arthropods in diets between corridors and woodlots in both spring and fall. However, Yellow-rumped Warblers in fall and Swainson’s Thrushes in spring showed between-habitat differences in dietary arthropod frequencies. These differences might be associated with variation in arthropod abundance between the two habitats. For example, counts of Polyphaga were higher and Formicidae lower at woodlots than at corridors, and, correspondingly, Swainson’s Thrushes consumed larger proportions of Polyphaga and smaller proportions of Formicidae at woodlots.
Arthropod abundance vs. energetic condition
Of the arthropod sampling methods employed in this study, only arthropod metrics from sticky-trap samples were significantly correlated with plasma metabolite levels related to refueling rates in migratory birds. Plasma triglyceride levels were positively correlated with both arthropod abundance and biomass from sticky traps in fall, but not spring. The positive relationship between plasma triglyceride levels and arthropods collected by sticky traps in fall is consistent with high flying insect numbers contributing to high fattening rates in fall migrants. Flying insect abundance and biomass were both lower in fall than in spring in the present study, so periods with higher flying insect availability in fall were associated with higher refueling rates at this season but not in spring, perhaps because flying insect abundance exceeded threshold levels promoting fattening throughout the spring migratory season. Plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels were positively correlated with arthropod abundance, but not biomass, and only in spring. The positive relationship between plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels and high abundance of flying insects in spring is difficult to explain because high fattening rates, from migrants feeding on abundant flying insects, should lead to reduced plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels (Guglielmo et al. 2005, Liu and Swanson 2014a). Sticky-trap arthropod biomass did not show a similar relationship with plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels in spring, perhaps suggesting that flying insects in spring were relatively small and low-quality diet items at this season, so inclusion of these insects in diets might result in relatively low fattening rates. The significant negative correlations of plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels with the flycatcher guild in spring for both models of arthropod abundance and biomass, however, reveals that the flycatcher guild, which feeds predominately on flying insects, had lower plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels than other foraging guilds in spring, so the suggestion that flying insects represent low-quality diet items in spring is not fully supported by the data in the present study.
Habitat (corridors vs. woodlots) was not a significant predictor of plasma metabolite levels for GLMM models in the present study, consistent with the conclusion of Liu and Swanson (2014a) that corridors and woodlots provided similarly suitable habitat for refueling for migrants. Given that branch-clip and pitfall-trap arthropod metrics were not significantly related to plasma metabolite levels in the present study and that plasma TRIG and BUTY levels in these habitats were at levels consistent with successful refueling (Liu and Swanson 2014a), these data collectively suggest that arthropods were sufficiently available to migrants at both corridors and woodlots to successfully refuel at these riparian stopover sites. The sole exception to this conclusion is the finding that low flying insect numbers in fall may act to negatively impact refueling rates for migrants in both habitat types.
Time since sunrise was significantly or nearly significantly positively related to plasma triglyceride levels in spring for both arthropod abundance and biomass models, consistent with a general trend of morning fattening in migratory or wintering birds (Guglielmo et al. 2005, Swanson and Thomas 2007, Smith and McWilliams 2010, Mandin and Vézina 2012). Time since sunrise was not significantly positively related to TRIG levels in fall, consistent with lower refueling rates during fall compared to spring in these habitats (Liu and Swanson 2014a), but was significantly or nearly significantly negatively correlated with plasma BUTY levels in fall, suggesting a reduction in reliance on mobilized fat during stopover as the morning progressed, consistent with other studies (e.g., Guglielmo et al. 2002, 2005, Smith and McWilliams 2010). The absence of a significant association between plasma TRIG and time since sunrise in fall may be a function of the lower refueling rates in these habitats in fall compared to spring (Liu and Swanson 2014a).
Arthropod counts and biomass were generally lower in spring 2011 than in 2010 and 2012 and lower in fall 2011 than in fall 2010 (Figs. 2–4). Spring fat deposition rates were lower in 2012 than in other years for several bird groups, including the foliage-gleaning guild, Tyrannidae, Parulidae, and Least Flycatchers (Liu and Swanson 2014a). Thus, year-to-year variation in arthropod abundance was not associated with similar variation in metrics of energetic condition in spring migrants. During fall migration, however, several migrant groups showed reduced fat deposition rates and higher baseline CORT levels in 2011 than in 2010 (Liu and Swanson 2014a, 2014b), which paralleled the lower arthropod abundances in fall 2011 than in fall 2010 documented in the present study.
Foliage-dwelling arthropod counts and biomass were higher in fall than in spring, but arthropod counts from both pitfall and sticky traps were higher in spring than in fall. Arthropod biomass from sticky traps was also higher in spring than in fall, although biomass from pitfall traps was similar between seasons. Liu and Swanson (2014a, 2014b) found that foliage-gleaner and ground-foraging guilds showed both higher plasma TRIG and/or baseline CORT levels in spring relative to fall. Thus, between-season differences in foliage-dwelling or flying arthropod counts and biomass were not reflected in similar between-season differences in fattening rates or stress hormone levels for migrant birds at our study sites. Arthropod counts from pitfall traps, however, were higher in spring than in fall, which is consistent with higher rates of fattening for ground-foraging birds in spring.
Taken together, these data suggest that arthropod prey were sufficiently diverse and abundant in both corridors and woodlots for migrants to replenish fuel stores during stopover, and further confirm that corridors and woodlots provide similarly suitable stopover habitats for woodland migrants during both spring and fall migration in the northern prairie region where woodland habitats are scarce (Liu and Swanson 2014a, 2014b, 2015). These results suggest that the conservation of even small woodland parcels, such as the isolated woodlot sites in this study, will benefit woodland birds by providing suitable stopover habitats during migration and thereby positively impact populations of these birds. Further, our data suggest that Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera are important arthropod taxa for migrant landbirds at our study sites, so conservation strategies focusing on increasing flying and foliage-dwelling arthropod populations, particularly of these arthropod taxa, might be especially beneficial to migrant birds.
RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE
Responses to this article are invited. If accepted for publication, your response will be hyperlinked to the article. To submit a response, follow this link. To read responses already accepted, follow this link.
This study was funded by grants from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the University of South Dakota, the South Dakota Ornithologists’ Union, and NSF OIA-1632810. We thank Eric Dressing, Michael Moxnes, Zach Orr, and Caitlin Crandall for assistance of arthropod collection and counting. We thank Mark Dixon for assistance with statistics. We thank Jay Carlisle for assistance with dietary arthropod identification. We also thank Jerry Prentice for constructing branch-clipping and sticky-trap tools. We thank Kathy Beard, John Davidson, and Dr. Kenneth Renner for access to woodlots during our study. Finally, we thank Dr. Daniel Soluk, Dr. Mark Dixon, Dr. Kenneth Renner, and Dr. Kent Jensen for helpful comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Allen, D. C. 2019. Nutritional hotspots? Prey from one ecosystem provide key fatty acids required for consumers in multiple ecosystems. Functional Ecology 33(10):1816-1817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13436
Bairlein, F. 2002. How to get fat: nutritional mechanism of seasonal fat accumulation in migratory songbirds. Naturwissenschaften 89:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-001-0279-6
Bakker, K. K. 2003. A compilation and synthesis of avian research completed in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota, USA.
Bates D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Berlanga H., J. A. Kennedy, T. D. Rich, M. C. Arizmendi, C. J. Beardmore, P. J. Blandcher, G. S. Butcher, A. R. Couturier, A. A. Dayer, D. W. Demarest, W. E. Easton, M. Gustafson, E. Iñigo-Elias, E. A. Krebs, A. O. Panjabi, V. Rodriguez Contreras, K. V. Rosenberg, J. M. Ruth, E. Santana Castellón, R. M. Vidal, and T. Will. 2010. Saving our shared birds: partners in flight tri-national vision for landbird conservation. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA. https://partnersinflight.org/resources/shared-birds/
Berthold, P. 1976. The control and significance of animal and vegetable nutrition in omnivorous songbirds. Ardea 64:140-153.
Bibby, C. J., and R. E. Green. 1981. Autumn migration strategies of Reed and Sedge Warblers. Ornis Scandinavica 12(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3675898
Bibby, C. J., and R. E. Green. 1983. Food and fattening of migrating warblers in some French marshlands. Ring and Migration 4(3): 175-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.1983.9673803
Blem, C. R. 1980. The energetics of migration. Pages 175-224 in S. A. Gauthreaux Jr., editor. Animal migration, orientation, and navigation. Academic, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-091833-4.50008-0
Bolduc, E., N. Casajus, P. Legagneux, L. McKinnon, H. G. Gilchrist, M. Leung, R. I. G. Morrison, D. Reid, P. A. Smith, C. M. Buddle, and J. Bêty. 2012. Terrestrial arthropod abundance and phenology in the Canadian Arctic: modelling resource availability for Arctic-nesting insectivorous birds. Canadian Entomology 145(2):155-170. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2013.4
Brenner, F. J., and F. Malin. 1965. Metabolism and survival time of the Red-Winged Blackbird. Wilson Bulletin 77(3):282-289. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/wilson/v077n03/p0282-p0289.pdf
Buler, J. J., F. R. Moore, and S. Woltmann. 2007. A multi-scale examination of stopover habitat use by birds. Ecology 88(7):1789-1802. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1871.1
Butakka, C. M. M., M. Grzybkowska, G. D. Pinha, and A. M. Takeda. 2014. Habitats and trophic relationships of Chironomidae insect larvae from the Sephotub River basin, Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Brazil Journal of Biology 74(2):395-407. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.26612
Calver, M. C., and R. D. Wooller. 1982. A technique for assessing the taxa, length, dry weight and energy content of the arthropod prey of birds. Australian Wildlife Research 9(2):293-301. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9820293
Carlisle, H. A. 1998. Abundance, diversity, and energetic condition of Neotropical woodland migrants during stopover in a geographically isolated farmstead woodlot in southeastern South Dakota. Thesis. University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA.
Carlisle, J. D., and R. L. Holberton. 2006. Relative efficiency of fecal versus regurgitated samples for assessing diet and the deleterious effects of a tartar emetic on migratory birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 77(2):126-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00032.x
Carlisle, J. D., K. L. Olmstead, C. H. Richart, and D. L. Swanson. 2012. Food availability, foraging behavior, and diet of autumn landbird migrants in the Boise Foothills of Southeastern Idaho. Condor 114(3):449-461. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.100209
Carlisle, J. D., S. K. Skagen, B. E. Kus, C. Van Riper III, K. L. Paxton, and J. F. Kelly. 2009. Landbird migration in the American West: recent progress and future research directions. Condor 111(2):211-225. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2009.080096
Castonguay, T. L. 1982. Forest area in eastern South Dakota, 1980. Research Note NC-291, North Central Forest Experiment Station. US Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Cerasale, D. J., and C. G. Guglielmo. 2010. An integrative assessment of the effects of tamarisk on stopover ecology of a long-distance migrant along the San Pedro River, Arizona. Auk 127(3):636-646. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2010.09124
Chan, E. K. W., Y. Zhang, and D. Dudgeon. 2007. Contribution of adult aquatic insects to riparian prey availability along tropical forest streams. Marine and Freshwater Research 58(8):725-732. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07033
Cimprich, D. A., M. S. Woodrey, and F. R. Moore. 2005. Passerine migrants respond to variation in predation risk during stopover. Animal Behaviour 69(5):1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.021
Cooper, R. J., and R. C. Whitmore. 1990. Arthropod sampling methods in ornithology. Studies in Avian Biology 13:29-37. https://sora.unm.edu/node/139266
Dallman, M., and R. J. Smith. 1995. Avian predation on chironomids along the nearshore waters of Lake Huron. Michigan Birds and Natural History 2:201-204.
Dean, K. L. 1999. Stopover ecology of Neotropical migrant songbirds in riparian corridors in the northern Great Plains. Dissertation. University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA.
del Rio, C. M., and S. R. McWilliams. 2016. How essential fats affect bird performance and link aquatic ecosystems and terrestrial consumers. PNAS 113(43):11988-11990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.161410611
Dixon, M. D., W. C. Johnson, M. L. Scott, D. E. Bowen, and L. A. Rabbe. 2012. Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA. Environmental Management 49:990-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5
Donovan T. M., C. J. Beardmore, D. N. Bonter, J. D. Brawn, R. J. Cooper, J. A. Fitzgerald, R. Ford, S. A. Gauthreaux, T. L. George, W. C. Hunter, T. E. Martin, J. Price, K. V. Rosenberg, P. D. Vickery, and T. B. Wigley. 2002. Priority research needs for the conservation of Neotropical landbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 73(4):329-339. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-73.4.329
Dreistadt, S. H., J. P. Newman, and K. L. Robb. 1998. Sticky trap monitoring of insect pests. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 21572. University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Emmenegger, T., S. Hahn, and S. Bauer. 2014. Individual migration timing of common nightingales is tuned with vegetation and prey phenology at breeding sites. BMC Ecology 14:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-9
Ewert, D. N., K. R. Hall, R. J. Smith, and P. G. Rodewald. 2015. Landbird stopover in the Great Lakes Region. Studies in Avian Biology 47:17-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283259613
Ewert, D. N., M. J. Hamas, R. J. Smith, M. E. Dallman, and S. W. Jorgensen. 2011. Distribution of migratory landbirds along the northern Lake Huron shoreline. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 123(3):536-547. https://doi.org/10.1676/09-122.1
Faaborg, J., R. T. Holmes, A. D. Anders, K. L. Bildstein, K. M. Dugger, S. A. Gauthreaux Jr., P. Heglund, K. A. Hobson, A. E. Jahn, D. H. Johnson, S. C. Latta, D. J. Levey, P. P. Marra, C. L. Merkord, E. Nol, S. I. Rothstein, T. W. Sherry, T. S. Sillett, F. R. Thompson, and N. Warnock. 2010. Recent advances in understanding migration systems of New World land birds. Ecological Monographs 80(1):3-48. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0395.1
Francis, C. M., and F. Cooke. 1986. Differential timing of spring migration in Wood Warblers (Parulinae). Auk 103(3):548-556. https://academic.oup.com/auk/article/103/3/548/5191387
Ganihar, S. R. 1997. Biomass estimates of terrestrial arthropods based on body length. Journal of Bioscience 22:219-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704734
Gentry, J. D., D. L. Swanson, and J. D. Carlisle. 2006. Species richness and nesting success of migrant forest birds in natural river corridors and anthropogenic woodlands in southeastern South Dakota. Condor 108(1):140-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/108.1.140
Graber, J. W., and R. R. Graber. 1983. Feeding rates of warblers in spring. Condor 85(2):139-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367247
Guglielmo, C. G., D. J. Cerasale, and C. Eldermire. 2005. A field validation of plasma metabolite profiling to assess refueling performance of migratory birds. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 78(1):116-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/425198
Guglielmo, C. G., P. D. O’Hara, and T. D. Williams. 2002. Extrinsic and intrinsic sources of variation in plasma lipid metabolites of free-living western sandpipers (Calidris mauri). Auk 119(2):437-445. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.2.437
Hamid, S. A, and C. S. M. Rawi. 2014. Ecology of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (Insecta) in rivers of the Gunung Jerai Forest Reserve: diversity and distribution of functional feeding groups. Tropical Life Sciences Research 25(1):61-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264122506
Hesse, L. W. 1996. Floral and faunal trends in the middle Missouri River. Pages 73-90 in D. L. Galat and A. G. Frazier, editors. Overview of river-floodplain ecology in the upper Mississippi River basin. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
Holmes, R. T., and S. K. Robinson. 1988. Spatial patterns, foraging tactics, and diets of ground-foraging birds in a northern hardwoods forest. Wilson Bulletin 100(3):377-394. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/wilson/v100n03/p0377-p0394.pdf
Hope, D. D., D. B. Lank, and R. C. Ydenberg. 2014. Mortality-minimizing sandpipers vary stopover behavior dependent on age and geographic proximity to migrating predators. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:827-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1695-x
Hódar, J. A. 1997. The use of regression equations for the estimation of prey length and biomass in diet studies of insectivore vertebrates. Miscellània Zoològica 20(2):1-10. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39078599.pdf
Horn, H. S. 1966. Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist 100(914):419-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/282436
Høye, T. T., and M. Forchhammer. 2008. The influence of weather conditions on the activity of high-arctic arthropods inferred from long-term observations. BMC Ecology 8:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-8
Hussel, D. J. T. 1969. Weight loss of birds during nocturnal migration. Auk 86(1):75-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/4083542
Jackson, A. K., C. A. Eagles-Smith, and C. Emery. 2020. Spatial variation in aquatic invertegrate and riparian songbird mercury exposure across a river-reservoir system with a legacy of mercury contamination. Ecotoxicology 29:1195-1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02043-z
Janiszewski, T., P. Minias, and Z. Woiciechowski. 2014. Timing of arrival at breeding grounds determines spatial patterns of productivity within the population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Population Ecology 56(1):217-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-013-0406-1
Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 6(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156
Johnson, M. D. 2000. Evaluation of an arthropod sampling technique for measuring for availability for insectivorous forest birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 71(1):88-109. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.1.88
Johnson, M. D. 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109(3):489-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/109.3.489
Johnson, W. C. 1992. Dams and riparian forests: case study from the upper Missouri River. Rivers 3:229-242.
Johnson, W. C., C. S. Adkisson, T. R. Crow, and M. D. Dixon. 1997. Nut caching by Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata L.): implications for tree demography. American Midland Naturalist 138(2):357-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2426828
Johnston, J. C., and R. L. Holberton. 2007. Forest management and temporal effects on food abundance for ground-foraging bird (Catharus guttatus). Forest Ecology and Management 258(7):1516-1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.012
Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Kelly, J. F., L. S. Delay, and D. M. Finch. 2002. Density-dependent mass gain by Wilson’s Warblers during stopover. Auk 119(1):210-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.1.210
Krause, M. J., R. Wanty, T. S. Schmidt, D. Walters, and R. E. Wolf. 2021. Variation in metal concentrations across a large contamination gradient is reflected in stream but not linked riparian food webs. Science of The Total Environment 769:144714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144714
Kuenzi, A. J., F. R. Moore, and T. R. Simons. 1991. Stopover of Neotropical landbird migrants on East Ship Island following trans-gulf migration. Condor 93(4):869-883. https://doi.org/10.2307/3247722
Lennox, R. J., J. M. Chapman, C. M. Souliere, C. Tudorache, M. Wikelski, J. D. Metcalfe, and S. J. Cooke. 2016. Conservation physiology of animal migration. Conservation Physiology 4(1):cov072. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cov072
Lill, J. T., and R. J. Marquis. 2004. Leaf ties as colonization sites for forest arthropods: an experimental study. Ecological Entomology 29(3):300-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00603.x
Linscott, J. A., and N. R. Senner. 2021. Beyond refueling: investigating the diversity of functions of migratory stopover events. Ornithological Applications 123(1):duaa074. https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duaa074
Liu, M., and D. L. Swanson. 2014a. Physiological evidence that anthropogenic woodlots can substitute for native riparian woodlands as stopover habitat for migrant birds. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 87(1):183-195. https://doi.org/10.1086/671746
Liu, M., and D. L. Swanson. 2014b. Stress physiology of migrant birds during stopover in natural and anthropogenic woodland habitats of the northern prairie region. Conservation Physiology 2(1):cou046 https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou046
Liu, M., and D. L. Swanson. 2015. Stopover duration, movement patterns and temporary home ranges of fall migrant Yellow-rumped Warblers Setophaga coronata in native and anthropogenic woodlands of the northern prairie region, USA. Journal of Avian Biology 46(5):452-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.00672
Mandin, C., and F. Vézina. 2012. Daily variation in markers of nutritional condition in wintering Black-Capped Chickadees Poecile atricapillus. Ibis 154(4):791-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01262.x
Manning, D. W. P., and S. M. P. Sullivan. 2021. Conservation across aquatic-terrestrail boundaries: linking continental-scale water quality to emergent aquatic insects and declining aerial insectivorous birds. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9:633160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.633160
Martin, T. E. 1980. Diversity and abundance of spring migratory birds using habitat islands on the Great Plains. Condor 82(4):440-448. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367570
Martin, T. E., and D. M. Finch. 1995. Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
Mehlman, D. W., S. E. Mabey, D. N. Ewert, C. Duncan, B. Abel, D. Cimprich, R. D. Sutter, and M. Woodrey. 2005. Conserving stopover sites for forest-dwelling migratory landbirds. Auk 122(4):1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.4.1281
Moore, F. R., K. M. Covino, W. B. Lewis, T. J. Zenzal Jr, and T. J. Benson. 2017. Effect of fuel deposition rate on departure fuel load of migratory songbirds during spring stopover along the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Avian Biology 48(1):123-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01335
Moore, F. R., and Y. Wang. 1991. Evidence of food-based competition among passerine migrants during stopover. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180984
Moorman, C. E., L. T. Bowen, J. C. Kilgo, J. L. Hanula, S. Horn, and M. D. Ulyshen. 2012. Arthropod abundance and seasonal bird use of bottomland forest harvest gaps. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124(1):31-39. https://doi.org/10.1676/11-020.1
Moorman, C. E., L. T. Bowen, J. C. Kilgo, C. E. Sorenson, J. L. Hanula, S. Hourn, and M. D. Ulyshen. 2007. Seasonal diets of insectivorous birds using canopy gaps in a bottomland forest. Journal of Field Ornithology 78(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00081.x
Muehlbauer, J. D., S. F. Collins, M. W. Doyle, and K. Tockner. 2014. How wide is a stream? Spatial extent of the potential “stream signature” in terrestrial food webs using meta-analysis. Ecology 95(1):44-55. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1628.1
Munes, E. C., M. D. Dixon, D. L. Swanson, C. L. Merkord, and A. R. Benson. 2015. Large, infrequent disturbance on a regulated river: response of floodplain forest birds to the 2011 Missouri River flood. Ecosphere 6(11):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00007.1
Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers, and J. M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38(3):541-545. https://doi.org/10.2307/3800887
Newberry, G. N., and D. L. Swanson. 2018. Elevated temperatures are associated with stress in rooftop-nesting Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) chicks. Conservation Physiology 6(1):coy010. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy010
Newton I. 2006. Can conditions experienced during migration limit the population levels of birds? Ornithology 147:146-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0058-4
Olson, J. R., S. J. Cooper, D. L. Swanson, M. J. Braun, and J. B. Williams. 2010. The relationship of metabolic performance and distribution in Black-capped and Carolina Chickadees. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 83(2):263-275. https://doi.org/10.1086/648395
Olson, J. R., and T. Grubb Jr. 2007. Winter adaptations in chickadees and titmice and the added effect of habitat fragmentation. Pages 236-275 in K. A. Otter, editor. Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an intergrated approach. Osford Ornithology, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
Pageau, C., M. M. Vale, M. A. Menezes, L. B. Barcante, M. Shaikh, M. A. S. Alves, and M. W. Reudink. 2020. Evolution of altitudinal migration in passerines is linked to diet. Ecology and Evolution 10(7):3338-3345. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6126
Parrish, J. D. 1997. Patterns of frugivory and energetic condition in nearctic landbirds during autumn migration. Condor 99(3):681-697. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370480
Pierce, B. J., and S. R. McWilliams. 2004. Diet quality and food limitation affect the dynamics of body composition and digestive organs in a migratory songbird (Zonotrichia albicollis). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77(3):471-483. https://doi.org/10.1086/383503
Piersma, T. 1987. Hop, skip or jump? Constraints in migration of arctic waders by feeding, fattening and flight speed. Limosa 60:185-194. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285152624
Poulin, B., and G. Lefebvre. 1996. Dietary relationships of migrant and resident birds from a humid forest in central Panama. Auk 113(2):277-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088894
Poulin, B., and G. Lefebvre. 1997. Estimation of arthropods available to birds: effect of trapping technique, prey distribution, and bird diet. Journal of Ornithology 68:426-442. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4514246
Poulin, B., G. Lefebvre, and R. McNeil. 1994. Diets of land birds from northeastern Venezuela. Condor 96(2):354-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369320
Ralph, C. P., S. E. Nagata, and C. J. Ralph. 1985 Analysis of droppings to describe diets of small birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 56(2):165-174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4513004
Rappole, J. H. 1995. The ecology of migrant birds: a neotropical perspective. Smithsonian, Washington, D.C., USA.
R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43(1):223-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x
Robinson, S. K., and R. T. Holmes. 1982. Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology 63(6):1918-1931. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940130
Rodewald, P. G., and M. C. Brittingham. 2002. Habitat use and behavior of mixed species landbird flocks during fall migration. Wilson Bulletin 114(1):87-98. https://doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2002)114[0087:HUABOM]2.0.CO;2
Rogers, L. E., R. L. Buschbom, and C. R. Watson. 1977. Length-weight relationships of shrub-steppe invertebrates. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 70(1):51-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/70.1.51
Rowse, L. M., A. D. Rodewald, and S. M. P. Sullivan. 2014. Pathways and consequences of contaminant flux to Acadian Flycatchers (Empidonax virescens) in urbanizing landscapes of Ohio, USA. Science of the Total Environment 485-486:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.095
Schaffers, A. P., I. P. Raemakers, K. V. Sýkora, and C. J. F. ter Braak. 2008. Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology 89(3):782-794. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0361.1
Schaub, M., and L. Jenni. 2001. Variation of fuelling rates among sites, days, and individuals in migrating passerine birds. Functional Ecology 15(5):584-594. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00568.x
Schilke, P. R., M. Bartons, J. M. Gorzo, M. J. Vander Zanden, C. Gratton, R. W. Howe, and A. M Pidgeon. 2020. Modeling a cross-ecosystem subsidy: forest songbird response to emergent aquatic insects. Landscape Ecology 35:1587-1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01038-0
Schmaljohann, H., and C. Eikenaar. 2017. How do energy stores and changes in these affect departure decisions by migratory birds? A critical view on stopover ecology studies and some future perspectives. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 203:411-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1166-8
Schwenk, W. S., A. M. Strong, and T. S. Sillett. 2010. Effects of bird predation on arthropod abundance and tree growth across an elevational gradient. Journal of Avian Biology 41(4):367-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04963.x
Simberloff, D., and T. Dayan. 1991. The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22:115-143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.000555
Smith, R. J., and M. I. Hatch. 2005. A comparison of shrub-dominated and forested habitat use by spring migrating landbirds in northeastern Pennsylvania. Condor 110(4):682-693. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.8588
Smith, R. J., F. R. Moore, and C. A. May. 2007. Stopover habitat along the shoreline of northern Lake Huron, Michigan: emergent aquatic insects as a food resource for spring migrating landbirds. Auk 124(1):107-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.1.107
Smith, S. B., and S. R. McWilliams. 2010. Patterns of fuel use and storage in migrationg passerines in relation to fruit resources at autumn stopover sites. Auk 127(1):108-118. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.09139
Smith, S. B., A. C. Miller, C. R. Merchant, and A. F. Sankoh. 2015. Local site variation in stopover physiology of migrating songbirds near the south shore of Lake Ontario is linked to fruit availability and quality. Conservation Physiology 3(1):cov036. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cov036
Steele, M. A., M. C. Brittingham, T. J. Maret, and J. F. Merritt. 2010. Terrestrial vertebrates of Pennsylvania: a complete guide to species of conservation concern. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Strode, P. K. 2009. Spring tree species use by migrating Yellow-rumped Warblers in relation to phenology and food availability. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(3):457-468. https://doi.org/10.1676/05-148.1
Strong, A. M. 2000. Divergent foraging strategies of two neotropical migrant warblers: implications for winter habitat use. Auk 117(2):381-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/117.2.381
Swanson, D. L., H. A. Carlisle, and E. T. Liknes. 2003. Abundance and richness of neotropical migrants during stopover at farmstead woodlots and associated habitats in southeastern South Dakota. American Midland Naturalist 149(1):176-191. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2003)149[0176:AARONM]2.0.CO;2
Swanson, D. L., K. L. Dean, H. A. Carlisle, and E. T. Liknes. 2005. Riparian and woodlot landscape patterns and migration of Neotropical migrants in riparian forests of eastern South Dakota. Pages 541-549 in C. J. Ralph and T. D. Rich, editors. Bird conservation implementation and integration in the Americas: proceedings of the third international Partners in Flight conference. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California, USA. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/31893
Swanson, D. L., and N. E. Thomas. 2007. The relationship of plasma indicators of lipid metabolism and muscle damage to overnight temperature in winter-acclimatized small birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 146(1):87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.004
Tallamy, D. W., and K. J. Shropshire. 2009. Ranking Lepidopteran use of native versus introduced plants. Conservation Biology 23(4):941-947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01202.x
Tallman, D. A., D. L. Swanson, and J. S. Palmer. 2002. Birds of South Dakota. South Dakota Ornithologists’ Union, Aberdeen, South Dakota, USA.
Tietz, J. R., and M. D. Johnson. 2007. Stopover ecology and habitat selection of juvenile Swainson’s Thrush during fall migration along the northern California coast. Condor 109(4):795-807. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/109.4.795
Triplehorn, C. A., N. R. Johnson, and D. J. Borror. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects. Seventh edition. Thompson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California, USA.
Tulp, I., and H. Schekkerman. 2008. Has prey availability for arctic birds advance with climate change? Hind casting the abundance of tundra arthropods using weather and seasonal variation. Arctic 61(1):48-60. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic6
Twining, C. W., J. Bernhardt, A. Derry, C. Hudson, A. Ishikawa, N. Kabeya, M. J. Kainz, J. Kitano, C. Kowarik, S. N. Ladd, M. C. Leal, K. Scharnweber, J. R. Shipley, and B. Matthews. 2021a. The evolutionary ecology of fatty acid variation: implications for consumer adaptation and diversification. Ecology Letter 24(8):1709–1731. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13771
Twining, C. W., J. T. Brenna, P. Lawrence, D. W. Winkler, A. S. Flecker, and N. G. Hairston Jr. 2019. Aquatic and terrestrial resources are not nutritionally reciprocal for consumers. Functional Ecology 33(10):2042–2052. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13401
Twining, C. W., J. T. Brenna, P. Lawrence, D. W. Winkler, J. R. Shipley, T. N. Tollefson, and D. W. Winkler. 2016. Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids support aerial insectivore performance more than food quantity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113:10920–10925. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603998113
Twining, C. W., T. P. Parmer, M. Mathieu-Resuge, M. J. Kainz, J. R. Shipley, and D. Martin-Creuzburg. 2021b. Use of fatty acids from aquatic prey varies with foraging strategy. Frontier of Ecology Evolution 9:735350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.735350
Twining, C. W., J. R. Shipley, and D. W. Winkler. 2018. Aquatic insects rich in omega-3 fatty acids breeding success in a widespread bird. Ecology Letters 21(12):1812-1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13156
van Bruggen, T. 1996. The vascular plants of South Dakota. Third edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Wang, Y., D. M. Finch, F. R. Moor, and J. F. Kelly. 1998. Stopover ecology and habitat use of migratory Wilson’s Warblers. Auk 115(4):829-842. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089502
Wang, Y., and F. R. Moore. 1997. Spring stopover of intercontinental migratory thrushes along the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Auk 114(2):263-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089167
Wesner, J., D. L. Swanson, M. D. Dixon, L. Yager, J. Warmbold, E. Oddy, and T. Seidel. 2020. Loss of potential aquatic-terrestrial subsidies along the Missouri River floodplain. Ecosystems 23:111-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00391-9
Wobbrock, J. O., L. Findlater, D. Gergle, and J. J. Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Pages 143-146 in Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, Canada, 2011). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
Wolfe, J. D. 2009. Diet of some spring migrant landbirds on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Journal of Caribbean Ornithology 22:37-40. https://jco.birdscaribbean.org/index.php/jco/article/view/159
Wolfe, J. D., M. D. Johnson, and C. J. Ralph. 2014. Do birds select habitat or food resources? Nearctic-neotropic migrants in northeastern Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 9(1):e86221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086221
Yard, H. K., C. V. Riper III, B. T. Brown, and M. J. Kearsley. 2004. Diets of insectivorous birds along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona. Condor 106(1):106-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.1.106